https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879705030588342272
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:16:38- @_XSPECT Morale, says Clark: Perceptual experience reflects sensory stimulation *relative to ongoing predictions* #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/qCCltKMkEz
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879704121309368320
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:13:01 - @fluffycyborg "According to Predictive Processing, perception is controlled hallucination." #HumanMind2017 3/? pic.twitter.com/WzlP0DUwgm
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879703928694333440
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:12:15 - @fluffycyborg A great summary of the Predictive Processing approach from Andy (opportune given how much we've heard about it so far!) #HumanMind2017 2/? pic.twitter.com/V2tK8EhoI7
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879703090018091008
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:08:55 - If the brain works by generating a virtual model that avoids prediction error, then why is experience perspectival? Discuss. #humanmind2017
https://twitter.com/msteenhagen/status/879702266084818946
— Maarten Steenhagen (@msteenhagen)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:05:38 - Next up: Andy Clark on predictive processing, predictably wearing an unpredictably coloured shirt. 😊 #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/gyPCGjg7wU
https://twitter.com/keith_wilson/status/879702138707902468
— Keith Wilson 🏳️🌈 (@keith_wilson)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:05:08 - Now we have Andy Clark @fluffycyborg talking to us about "Prediction, Perception, and Imagination" #HumanMind2017 1/? pic.twitter.com/qPm8fCg7P5
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879702063080505345
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:04:50 - @_XSPECT Clark's mid way summary -- Is perception controlled imagination? #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/aePXOlRabH
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879702048987430913
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:04:47 - X-SPECT PI, Andy Clark on understanding Perception as Imagination, appropriately constrained. #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/M9lZUNpVXo
https://twitter.com/_XSPECT/status/879701742941741056
— Expecting Ourselves (@_XSPECT)Tue, Jun 27 2017 14:03:34 - Andy Clark (@_XSPECT): well understood, perception blurs into imagination and into thought, and that's OK #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/EN0jC70KAi
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879700677169172480
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:59:20 - Full conclusions Noppeney on multisensory perception #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/zcFzYlH172
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879699936706736129
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:56:23 - Multisensory awareness is no all or nothing matter, says Noppeney #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/s4Hc1SxhPa
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879699571630379008
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:54:56 - In next section, Noppeney refers to Mudrik et al on 'unconscious' multisensory integration (pdf) https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b2bc/e89431008d8420539bb84fbcff78643b2c16.pdf … #HumanMind2017
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879698895940571136
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:52:15 - Uta argues that thinking of perception on the model of Bayesian causal inference can help explain this. #HumanMind2017 3/? pic.twitter.com/NgH9WPTNhe
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879696914194759681
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:44:22 - Summary of part 1 of Noppeney's talk #humanmind2017 pic.twitter.com/XwWDEAwcka
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879696686318223361
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:43:28 - Other folks live tweeting #HumanMind2017 include @HumanMindDebate, @studyofthemind, @chrismeyns, and @_XSPECT (aka Andy Clark). 📢
https://twitter.com/keith_wilson/status/879696376107499520
— Keith Wilson 🏳️🌈 (@keith_wilson)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:42:14 - Noppeney: When is something an illusion? Depends on sensory information integration #humanmind2017
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879696052596736000
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:40:57 - Uta's question: how do minds construct a world out of a barrage of multisensory input? #HumanMind2017 2/? pic.twitter.com/JeSPgTXptL
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879695963157397504
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:40:36 - Uta Noppeney on how the brain uses Bayesian inference to balance segregation vs integration of multi-sensory information #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/DYA3H7GiYHhttps://t.co/DYA3H7GiYHpic.twitter.com/DYA3H7GiYH
https://twitter.com/_XSPECT/status/879695309143756800
— Expecting Ourselves (@_XSPECT)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:38:00 - Uta Noppeney now talking about "Constructing a representation of the world across the senses" #HumanMind2017 1/? pic.twitter.com/0SYhjXuAv2
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879694262547488768
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:33:50 - Uta Noppeney on consciousness across the senses #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/gd8lPuHv2x
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879693342245875713
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:30:11 - @anilkseth AS: "This predictive framework can explain conscious level, conscious content, and conscious self." 6/6 #HumanMind2017 pic.twitter.com/m4P9GLirVk
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879693070907961347
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:29:06 - .@anilkseth's conclusion: Consciousness emerges because of, not in spite of, our beast-machine nature #humanmind2017 pic.twitter.com/cVk4cpxfNA
https://twitter.com/chrismeyns/status/879692702274785280
— ᴍᴇʏɴs (@chrismeyns)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:27:38 - @anilkseth AS: "This framework can help explain abnormal perception (hallucination)" as in the Sussex campus perceived as dogs! #HumanMind2017 5/? pic.twitter.com/0DK34V1VVz
https://twitter.com/studyofthemind/status/879691223266713603
— New Directions (@studyofthemind)Tue, Jun 27 2017 13:21:46
