- No, it disintegrates families RT @NoopurTiwari In welfare states most #AgingParents get a decent retirement benefit.Gives them more dignity
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224408280754176000
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:41:18 - If the state gives you social security etc for old age, incentive to have children reduced. Latter also feel no responsibility to take care
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224409245649608704
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:45:08 - Help your parents. Universal entitlements even for the lower middle class old is wrong and immoral. Only the very poorest should get help.
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224409423119003648
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:45:50 - @swaraj_india Come now..Surely, that is peace from worry about affording health care. Parents also feel independent @NoopurTiwari
http://twitter.com/menkris/status/224409504081657856
— Meena N Swamy (@menkris)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:46:09 - . @menkris People should buy their own healthcare and/or insurance. Work, save. And independent means lonely in practice. @NoopurTiwari
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224410009616916480
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:48:10 - @swaraj_india 'Help us help our parents' is more like it. Health care costs are astronomical. Universal public health insurance is a right
http://twitter.com/menkris/status/224409976045707264
— Meena N Swamy (@menkris)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:48:02 - . @menkris Universal public health insurance is a right? Going to the moon is also a right? Sure, so long as that does not involve taxing me
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224410176978038784
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:48:50 - @swaraj_india Yes it is a right.I cannot choose if I or my loved ones fall ill; I want the best for them.The moon is for singing songs under
http://twitter.com/menkris/status/224411492907360257
— Meena N Swamy (@menkris)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:54:03 - As you continue with the Hindutva/beef/conversions thing, equally well-intentioned folks like Aamir are doing NAC's work - more Rights.
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224411604400340993
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 07:54:30 - The right can just drop say a couple of issues -beef, conversions- and actually become genuinely secular. The left would have to drop tons.
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224416930080108545
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:15:40 - @swaraj_india hmm. I find the conversion bit secular, actually.
http://twitter.com/Flyfiddlesticks/status/224417222565707776
— Prasanna (@Flyfiddlesticks)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:16:49 - @Flyfiddlesticks Not allowing others to change their religion - even if for money - is not secular. Of course, related issues of edu quotas.
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224417400114774016
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:17:32 - @swaraj_india I don't see why people care so much about beef, conversions. Does it affect our daily life as much as screwed up economy?
http://twitter.com/raksopenmind/status/224418310354239488
— Rakesh Babu G R (@raksopenmind)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:21:09 - @swaraj_india No ban on conversion if it is out of free will but not if under coercion or lure - absolutely secular. @Flyfiddlesticks
http://twitter.com/malviyamit/status/224418720771092481
— Amit Malviya (@malviyamit)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:22:47 - . @malviyamit do not combine lure or coercion. former is voluntary, latter by definition is not. hence this not secular @Flyfiddlesticks
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224419053173878784
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:24:06 - @swaraj_india @Flyfiddlesticks In real world it is often not easy to segregate the two. We can address that by banning foreign funds - fine?
http://twitter.com/malviyamit/status/224419810585481216
— Amit Malviya (@malviyamit)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:27:07 - Instead of banning foreign religious funding, we should perhaps consider allowing it on a reciprocal basis. Therefore, US money OK, not KSA
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224421242986434560
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:32:48 - @malviyamit has elaborated on what I was referring to @swaraj_india,seeing your response I'm assuming you agree then?
http://twitter.com/Flyfiddlesticks/status/224425928615395329
— Prasanna (@Flyfiddlesticks)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:51:25 - @Flyfiddlesticks I said in a separate tweet that we should ban funds from only those countries who would not accept our funds @malviyamit
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224426232668897280
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 08:52:38 - @swaraj_india @Flyfiddlesticks That would be ignoring the basic construct of Hinduism - it does not actively work to convert.
http://twitter.com/malviyamit/status/224429984217960450
— Amit Malviya (@malviyamit)Sun, Jul 15 2012 09:07:32 - @malviyamit @Flyfiddlesticks Indian funds, not Hindu funds necessarily. Moreover, we are talking about allowed - if we dont send, our fault.
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224431940554600448
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 09:15:19 - @swaraj_india @Flyfiddlesticks India is a secular State - should not encourage any religion and hence no question of sending funds anywhere.
http://twitter.com/malviyamit/status/224432700776398849
— Amit Malviya (@malviyamit)Sun, Jul 15 2012 09:18:20 - @malviyamit @Flyfiddlesticks state will not send or encourage sending funds. Individual Indians -or in groups- would. What is so confusing?
http://twitter.com/swaraj_india/status/224433074019119104
— Swaraj India (@swaraj_india)Sun, Jul 15 2012 09:19:49 - @swaraj_india @Flyfiddlesticks But Indian State has the responsibility to protect social fabric of India and hence should regulate funding.
http://twitter.com/malviyamit/status/224433333285830656
— Amit Malviya (@malviyamit)Sun, Jul 15 2012 09:20:51





