@MsMatchGirl depends on if you actually find genuine value in them. We do as traffic sources.
@MatthewKnell But that's not a passive Like. That's an engaged user - who clicks through.- @MsMatchGirl right, but they all start passive, for different reasons. You activate diff folks on each kind of content.
- @MatthewKnell I think that's true for you guys. But you create content - you've got a lot of dials to play with. ;)
- @MsMatchGirl sure. But having content just increases the likelihood you snare folks. That's the curate/create/minimum posts argument
- @MatthewKnell But not the same when it comes for Edgerank... :P
- @MsMatchGirl 5% of 3 million is still better than 5% of 300k. At least to us :)
- @MatthewKnell Thaty's probably true. Makes sense.
- @MatthewKnell I just want clients to understand engaging existing, actual fans. Not spend big cash on buying 'em w/a contest or whatnot.
- @MsMatchGirl well,true,both need to work in concert - if after purchase spike is done, content sucks, they all leave
- @MatthewKnell Yes! And that's the conversation that people often lose, IMO
- @MatthewKnell There is a lot of push back from the C-suite at many brands. Sometimes hands get tied. A bummer, for sure. But a fact of life.
- @MsMatchGirl sure... But sometimes they need to pay for the lesson. Buy them and then watch them atrophy
- @MatthewKnell If only they would actually learn the lesson... *sigh* ;)
- @MsMatchGirl those who want to be good at this will
- @MsMatchGirl they need to care once, twice, repeatedly - classic top half of Maslow: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs …
- @MsMatchGirl file under you do what you can with the best you have
Embed
Show Templates
