Reactions to #prwdebate

In addition to the lively panel discussion and participation from the audience, there were people following the live stream and taking part on Twitter using the hashtag #prwdebate, and the discussion continues online.

Jack Millner29 Views

Favicon for https://storify.com

There are hundreds of tweets that used the #prwdebate hashtag, so if you spot a discussion online that we missed, give us a shout.
Lou Woodley @LouWoodley
Was there a Storify of the #prwdebate discussions? cc @McDawg @Protohedgehog
Fri, Apr 04 2014 11:05:01
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/LouWoodley/status/452039129254354944
— Lou Woodley (@LouWoodley)Fri, Apr 04 2014 11:05:01
Yup!
Got a photo with @TomReller the other night after the debate on peer review! #Elsebier #prwdebate pic.twitter.com/TmrEYaTOSx
Jon Tennant @Protohedgehog
@peerrevwatch
·
·
Fri, Apr 04 2014 11:45:17
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/Protohedgehog/status/452049262202085376
— Jon Tennant (@Protohedgehog)Fri, Apr 04 2014 11:45:17
Kamatlab @KamatlabND
@McDawg @jack_millner PeerReview is not broken! Good papers are well reviewed. Weak papers pose problem to get reviews & ed-dec. #prwdebate
@peerrevwatch
·
Sat, Apr 05 2014 21:31:09
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/KamatlabND/status/452559088874844160
— Kamatlab (@KamatlabND)Sat, Apr 05 2014 21:31:09
Intense debates require intense refreshments.
Graham Steel @McDawg
Nice ending to "Is Peer Review Broken?" - "The wine is that way" ! #prwdebate
@DrKLidster
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 19:05:06
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/McDawg/status/451435169350942720
— Graham Steel (@McDawg)Wed, Apr 02 2014 19:05:06
Niko Kriegeskorte @NKriegeskorte
fun debate yesterday: #prwdebate. for peer review to be open, it has to be post-publication.
@Chitananda_NM
·
Thu, Apr 03 2014 16:00:02
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/NKriegeskorte/status/451750983073529858
— Niko Kriegeskorte (@NKriegeskorte)Thu, Apr 03 2014 16:00:02
Atwood Tate @AtwoodTate
Worth a look! Peer review debate @peerrevwatch #prwdebate video on youtube of last night’s event - http://ow.ly/vpVZo
@peerrevwatch
·
Fri, Apr 04 2014 07:47:57
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/AtwoodTate/status/451989536374276096
— Atwood Tate (@AtwoodTate)Fri, Apr 04 2014 07:47:57
Jocelyn Timperley @jloistf
Fantastic debate on peer review yesterday @CityUniLondon with nicely balanced panel. Had my mind changed and back about 5 times #prwdebate
@lindsay_mck
·
Thu, Apr 03 2014 14:30:45
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/jloistf/status/451728515814412288
— Jocelyn Timperley (@jloistf)Thu, Apr 03 2014 14:30:45
Jon Tennant @Protohedgehog
Post-publication peer review used to be called science. When did that change..? #prwdebate
@GerardPinzone
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:12:02
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/Protohedgehog/status/451421816096292864
— Jon Tennant (@Protohedgehog)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:12:02
Graham Steel @McDawg
@peerrevwatch It was fab, greatly enjoyed it ! Thanks. #prwdebate
@peerrevwatch
·
Thu, Apr 03 2014 10:43:33
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/McDawg/status/451671338366025728
— Graham Steel (@McDawg)Thu, Apr 03 2014 10:43:33
Sibele Fausto @sibelefausto
See hashtag #prwdebate. Good stuff on #peerreview. Worth a look. o/
@ingorohlfing
·
Thu, Apr 03 2014 04:18:04
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/sibelefausto/status/451574326794260480
— Sibele Fausto (@sibelefausto)Thu, Apr 03 2014 04:18:04
Oliver Preston @OJPreston
Solution: Screen papers with open-access review; publish with DOI; but don't trust until crowd-review has offered support #prwdebate
@peerrevwatch
·
Thu, Apr 03 2014 08:14:51
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/OJPreston/status/451633918157287424
— Oliver Preston (@OJPreston)Thu, Apr 03 2014 08:14:51
Jon Tennant @Protohedgehog
Bollocks. Open peer review will not harm anyone. If a younger researcher is rightly critical of a paper, that's *good*!! #prwdebate
@andrewhkemp
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 17:47:48
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/Protohedgehog/status/451415719063064577
— Jon Tennant (@Protohedgehog)Wed, Apr 02 2014 17:47:48
F1000Research @F1000Research
@Roobina @easternblot has made a @MendeleyTips group to share papers with examples of open peer reviews #prwdebate: http://www.mendeley.com/groups/3566561/open-peer-review/ …
@inothernews
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 17:31:45
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/F1000Research/status/451411676513206272
— F1000Research (@F1000Research)Wed, Apr 02 2014 17:31:45
Love was in the air...
Graham Steel @McDawg
"Should we abolish Impact Factor?" says Connie St Louis. I think I'm in love. #prwdebate
@abbybeall
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:54:06
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/McDawg/status/451432402708365312
— Graham Steel (@McDawg)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:54:06
Impact factors were called into question:
Lindsay McKenzie @lindsay_mck
Abolish impact factors? Yay or nay? #prwdebate
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:52:18
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/lindsay_mck/status/451431949694160896
— Lindsay McKenzie (@lindsay_mck)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:52:18
David Acunzo @DavidAcunzo
@lindsay_mck Very difficult... Today authors are just asked to state conflicts of interest... #prwdebate
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:53:56
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/DavidAcunzo/status/451432360815632384
— David Acunzo (@DavidAcunzo)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:53:56
David Acunzo @DavidAcunzo
@lindsay_mck Most papers have an agenda. Get an theory visibility, get the author famous, a tenured position... #prwdebate
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:50:02
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/DavidAcunzo/status/451431380208353281
— David Acunzo (@DavidAcunzo)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:50:02
Bonnie Swoger @bonnieswoger
Peer review is important for non-experts, esp. for students. But if its done transparently, it can be pre or post. #prwdebate
@IKnowA84
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:32:27
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/bonnieswoger/status/451426954374561792
— Bonnie Swoger (@bonnieswoger)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:32:27
Recent high profile retractions were drawn into the debate.
Jalees Rehman @jalees_rehman
.@IanJohnPereira Example: Stem cell acid paper has #Altmetric score of 2822 - one of the highest ever! http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v505/n7485/nature12968/metrics … #prwdebate
@mrgunn
·
Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:33:18
Reply Retweet Favorite
//twitter.com/jalees_rehman/status/451427166715006976
— Jalees Rehman (@jalees_rehman)Wed, Apr 02 2014 18:33:18

Like