1. The key phrases here are "bring history alive" and "keeping true to the facts." There are two possible readings of the tweet. The student might think history must be made lively by flexing or embellishing the facts. Or they might think that it's easy to lose sight of the second task (keeping true to the facts) while pursuing the first (bring history alive).
  2. The quotes suggest the student is aware they’re using a common trope about historical texts ('dull' past texts). Nonetheless, the sources are the issue here. History is boring because the texts it is based on are boring.
  3. The student highlights the flexibility of the term “interesting.” What they find interesting might not be interesting to others. A historical account might be interesting to the person writing it, but this doesn’t always translate to a broader audience.
  4. The tweet seems to suggest that it would be easier to bring history to life if personal bias (opinion/perspective) could be included. They assume that history must be neutral and objective. History is boring because it is supposed to be devoid of personal opinions - and perhaps, by extension, personal relevance.
  5. The tension here is between the amount, rather than the quality, of information and the desire to make the post fun. History is boring because there is just too much information.
Read next page