- Welcome to #ACESchat for May 7. ACES president @tschmedding will lead a discussion on fighting plagiarism and fabrication.
http://twitter.com/copyeditors/status/331860873289273344
— ACES (@copyeditors)Tue, May 07 2013 19:59:32 - You can download the ebook "Telling the Truth and Nothing But" at RJI -- http://www.rjionline.org/newsbooks/aces s/ACESchatESchat
http://twitter.com/copyeditors/status/331861234775388160
— ACES (@copyeditors)Tue, May 07 2013 20:00:58 - ACES worked with several top j orgs to research, write book on plagiarism. Then held summit in April. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331861577017982976
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:02:20 - @copyeditors Craig Silverman wrote a blog counting a rash of cases. Said someone should do something. ACES stepped up. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331861944069918720
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:03:47 - Question 1 asked why copy editors should be involved in the fight against plagiarism and fabrication.
- Copy editors are gatekeepers. Our job is to protect our credibility and maintain reader trust by catching errors, plagiarism. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331862296202727424
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:05:11 - A1: Why should we be concerned: As copy editors, we're the representative of the reader. We need to be focused on truth. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/gerrrib/status/331863111466381312
— Gerri Berendzen (@gerrrib)Tue, May 07 2013 20:08:26 - At a medical conference this week; noticed this new campaign: http://ethics.elsevier.com/ ACEACESchat
http://twitter.com/DragonflyEdit/status/331866643246485505
— Dragonfly Editorial (@DragonflyEdit)Tue, May 07 2013 20:22:28 - Good to see. RT @DragonflyEdit: At a medical conference this week; noticed this new campaign: http://ethics.elsevier.com/ ACEACESchat
http://twitter.com/EditorMark/status/331867416739078144
— Mark Allen (@EditorMark)Tue, May 07 2013 20:25:32 - Next Teresa defined the issues and asked a question:
- Plagiarism: Nonfiction, copying sans attribution. Fabrication: Fiction, making up people, facts. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331862762064068609
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:07:02 - Can you self-plagiarize? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331863140126048256
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:08:32 - No. But the term itself is bad. We need to be honest when we're recycling old material. RT @tschmedding: Can you self-plagiarize? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/EditorMark/status/331863601310736384
— Mark Allen (@EditorMark)Tue, May 07 2013 20:10:22 - @EditorMark : Good point. Not being honest with readers should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331864526825865216
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:14:03 - @tschmedding OK to borrow from own work when writing for oneself, not when writing for a 3rd party that expects original content. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/PreciseProofing/status/331863714527604738
— Precise Proofing (@PreciseProofing)Tue, May 07 2013 20:10:49 - That's a good question. Bottom line is you're not being honest with readers. RT @tschmedding: Can you self-plagiarize? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/gerrrib/status/331863281813835777
— Gerri Berendzen (@gerrrib)Tue, May 07 2013 20:09:06 - If you want to recycle your own stuff, you need to tell the readers you're doing it. RT @tschmedding: Can you self-plagiarize? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/gerrrib/status/331863978403823616
— Gerri Berendzen (@gerrrib)Tue, May 07 2013 20:11:52 - I would link to my other work. More hits for me, more transparency for readers. RT @tschmedding: Can you self-plagiarize? #aceschat
http://twitter.com/popular_soda/status/331864266116308993
— Popular Soda (@popular_soda)Tue, May 07 2013 20:13:01 - Self-plagiarism: Summit panel says not really. BUT you should be transparent with readers that it's recycled info. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331863973056090113
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:11:51 - I recently reworked an old feature written for the Editorial Eye (now defunct) into a white ppt. Do I note that? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/DragonflyEdit/status/331864395007275008
— Dragonfly Editorial (@DragonflyEdit)Tue, May 07 2013 20:13:32 - Now for some advice on how to spot plagiarism:
- Q3: What can copy editors and all journalists do to help change the culture that lets plagiarism happen? #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/copyeditors/status/331864282276958211
— ACES (@copyeditors)Tue, May 07 2013 20:13:05 - Q3: Copy editors can keep eagle eye out for attribution. None in story should be a red flag. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/tschmedding/status/331865085226123265
— Teresa Schmedding (@tschmedding)Tue, May 07 2013 20:16:16 - One way to spot plagiarists: when the writer's style veers and you can say "wait, he wouldn't have written that." then google it. #aceschat
http://twitter.com/c_m_eds/status/331865246748782593
— C-M Editors (@c_m_eds)Tue, May 07 2013 20:16:55 - @copyeditors Make co-workers aware. And encourage writers — get them excited about producing original and engaging content. #ACESchat
http://twitter.com/erinkshields/status/331865162892075011
— Erin Shields (@erinkshields)Tue, May 07 2013 20:16:35
ACES chat: Fighting plagiarism and fabrication
ACES President Teresa Schmedding and Twitter chatters continued the discussion from the National Summit to Fight Plagiarism and Fabrication on April 5.
by
ACES63 Views
ACES63 Views- Question 1 asked why copy editors should be involved in the fight against plagiarism and fabrication.
- Next Teresa defined the issues and asked a question:
- Now for some advice on how to spot plagiarism:
Embed
Show Templates








