- UPDATE June 20: The Intercept published the full 306 page disclosure:
- — Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)Fri, Jun 19 2015 00:54:41"...Govt declined Google's request saying only that the Order involves a different investigation than the one underlying the Twitter Order."
- For more information about the mentioned "Twitter Order" see information about the Wikileaks-related Twitter legal disclosures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks-related_Twitter_court_orders …
- — Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)Fri, Jun 19 2015 01:05:41I feel like I should send flowers to Google's legal team. They must have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on this case alone.
- — Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)Fri, Jun 19 2015 01:30:31This is perhaps the best footnote of my entire life: "The government does not concede that the [redacted] subscriber is a journalist"
- — Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)Fri, Jun 19 2015 01:35:28US Govt claims that unsealing the Twitter order "has seriously jeopardized the Investigation" ie: it's hard to politically harass in public!
- I think they mean this one:
- — Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)Fri, Jun 19 2015 01:41:24Naturally, the coward who filed these legal remarks has his or her name redacted from the documents. Wait, what do you have to hide? Pigs.
Jacob Appelbaum's legal disclosure from Google about Wikileaks Grand Jury investigation
byBethany Horne2 Likes41,482 Views