- — Lou Joscelyne-Loane (@pugglenchuckle)Thu, Aug 01 2013 22:53:25The 3rd ump should be replaced with worm thing used in tv debates! Mortified you can get out without hitting the ball! #ABCAshes
- — Cat Jones (@Cricketbatcat)Thu, Aug 01 2013 22:05:05
- — Luke Jarvis (@Lukejarvis1982)Thu, Aug 01 2013 21:23:49
- — John Murray (@SidebySidePies)Thu, Aug 01 2013 23:00:28
- — Mark Duffett (@MarkDuffett)Thu, Aug 01 2013 21:20:32
- — Tom Barker (@tommyb40)Thu, Aug 01 2013 20:57:24@abcgrandstand there was nothing wrong with the DRS there, it was incompetence by the 3rd umpire. The technology clearly pointed to not out
- — Damien Drew (@drumondo)Thu, Aug 01 2013 20:55:26@abcgrandstand if they can't get it right with technological aids and video replays, get rid of it. It's a blight on the game right now.
- — Mike Linwood (@mikelinny)Thu, Aug 01 2013 20:54:38@abcgrandstand fully trained operators. Impartial to both teams and the other umpires and mic'd up so we can hear their deliberations.
- — Mike Pattons toenail (@pattonmeister)Thu, Aug 01 2013 21:11:34@abcgrandstand DRS isn't the issue, the umpires adjudicating it that's the problem. The fault last night lies with Hill and Dharmasena
- — Richmond Millier (@Roger_Rogering)Thu, Aug 01 2013 20:39:12
Cricket's DRS system in spotlight after Khawaja's dismissal in third Ashes Test
Cricket's controversial Decision Review System (DRS) has again made headlines following the controversial dismissal of Australian batsman Usman Khawaja on the first day of the third Ashes Test at Old Trafford. Does the DRS need to be changed? Or are dismissals like Khawaja's just part of the game?
byABC News10,660 Views