As seen onFavicon for https://m.facebook.comm.facebook.com

Make no mistake: Gamergate condones harassment, of Zoe Quinn, and of others.

Embed

  1. Okay, I tried a little Twitter experiment last night. I get told over and over again that Gamergate doesn't condone harassment. I don't believe it, but in good faith I put this tweet out there.
  2. The charity-funding, I later discovered, was an attempt to shame an anti-GG writer at Gawker for a pro-bullying joke. But that's neither here nor there.
  3. ("Literally Who" 1, 2 and 3 is what Gamergaters refer to these three women as.)
  4. This is important - only one (Anita) is a journalist. Only one (Zoe) is accused of ethics violations, and in her case Gamergate has backpedaled desperately in an attempt to distance the movement from her (Hence, "Literally Who")
  5. (cut to 54 minutes after the initial post)
  6. (I wish I'd taken a better picture.)
  7. At this point, I switched over to trying to make the case more sincerely. I could not keep my sarcasm from creeping in, but I made the best possible case I could because I sincerely believe it would be Gamergate's best move.
16
Share

Share

Facebook
Google+