- Some scientific papers are wonderfully elegant presentations of research. What makes a manuscript a #joytoread? RT & weigh in w hashtag!
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248399301506658304
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:33:03 - @emilytmurray Aesthetics may be in eye of beholder, but I will post my thoughts under #joytoread. Hope others will weigh in too!
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248399614074552322
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:34:17 - Interesting and thought provoking data make a paper a #joytoread . I read fiction for cute turns of phrase. #thisaintthearts
http://twitter.com/drugmonkeyblog/status/248400046389882881
— Drug Monkey (@drugmonkeyblog)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:36:00 - Never neglecting the flow of language, not weighing a sentence down w too much info make a paper a #joytoread.
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248400484010962944
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:37:45 - @biochembelle Nothing grates on me more than use of complexity to pretend incremental finding is revolutionary. #joytoread
http://twitter.com/MTomasson/status/248400895564447744
— Michael Tomasson (@MTomasson)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:39:23 - #joytoread Clear, even nearly conversational language. You almost forget it's science bc it's become a story.
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248401103102816256
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:40:12 - +1 RT @biochembelle: #joytoread Clear, even nearly conversational language. You almost forget it's science bc it's become a story.
http://twitter.com/genegeek/status/248403424671043587
— genegeek (@genegeek)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:49:26 - #joytoread An abstract that neatly summarises with a paper that uses easy to understand language.
http://twitter.com/ScientistMags/status/248402303097380864
— Mags Lum (@ScientistMags)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:44:58 - #joytoread Summarizing large/complex datasets clearly w/o oversimplifying or over-detailing
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248402337566179328
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:45:07 - #joytoread A clear explanation of what the statistics mean in relation to the study without over simplification.
http://twitter.com/ScientistMags/status/248402502008074240
— Mags Lum (@ScientistMags)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:45:46 - It's a #joytoread papers that integrate previously published work as part of story instead of a list of facts.
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248402771106209792
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:46:50 - THIS! RT @biochembelle: It's a #joytoread papers that integrate previously published work as part of story instead of a list of facts.
http://twitter.com/ScientistMags/status/248402926710689792
— Mags Lum (@ScientistMags)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:47:27 - but...those are *incremental* advances then and clearly shitty science. #joytoread @biochembelle
http://twitter.com/drugmonkeyblog/status/248403350427664384
— Drug Monkey (@drugmonkeyblog)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:49:08 - Agreed RT @biochembelle: It's a #joytoread papers that integrate previously published work as part of story instead of a list of facts.
http://twitter.com/genegeek/status/248403487468175362
— genegeek (@genegeek)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:49:41 - Helps us too RT @biochembelle It’s a #joytoread papers that integrate previously published work as part of story instead of a list of facts.
http://twitter.com/edyong209/status/248406099651342336
— Ed Yong (@edyong209)Wed, Sep 19 2012 13:00:03 - @edyong209 Would love to hear what makes a paper a #joytoread for ppl outside the lab. Important for communication w ppl outside our fields.
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248407182817755137
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 13:04:22 - @biochembelle I'd REALLY love to know how studies started & preceding work. In intro, often hard to tell which cites are from same group!
https://twitter.com/edyong209/status/248407952896188416
— Ed Yong (@edyong209)Wed, Sep 19 2012 13:07:25 - @biochembelle Also, a Q I always ask: "Did any bits surprise you?" Anything that makes it a human activity vs. just dry academic record
https://twitter.com/edyong209/status/248408892046991360
— Ed Yong (@edyong209)Wed, Sep 19 2012 13:11:09 - #joytoread Diagrams and figures with meaningful captions.
http://twitter.com/ScientistMags/status/248402867726196736
— Mags Lum (@ScientistMags)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:47:13 http://twitter.com/ArthriticSci/status/248403205204099072
— Arthritic Scientist (@ArthriticSci)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:48:33- #joytoread using null data to build to 'suspense' (for lack of better word) and resolving w additional data
http://twitter.com/biochembelle/status/248403863982448640
— biochem belle (@biochembelle)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:51:10 - Gag. Me. RT @biochembelle: #joytoread using null data to build to 'suspense' (for lack of better word) and resolving w additional data
http://twitter.com/drugmonkeyblog/status/248404528330833920
— Drug Monkey (@drugmonkeyblog)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:53:49 - Those just piss me off RT @drugmonkeyblog Gag. Me. RT @biochembelle #joytoread using null data to build 'suspense' and resolving w add data
http://twitter.com/drisis/status/248410946253512704
— Dr. Isis (@drisis)Wed, Sep 19 2012 13:19:19 - Complete Methods sections make papers a #joytoread
http://twitter.com/drugmonkeyblog/status/248404401025339392
— Drug Monkey (@drugmonkeyblog)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:53:18 - This. Hate digging through 20 papers to get the real story RT @drugmonkeyblog: Complete Methods sections make papers a #joytoread
http://twitter.com/LabSpaces/status/248405163491094529
— Brian Krueger, PhD (@LabSpaces)Wed, Sep 19 2012 12:56:20
