Guardian names Manning as source. Sarah Tisdall mark 2. The slimiest media organization in the UK. http://is.gd/GT0tzF

It should be noted, that as far as we know, neither we, nor the Guardian have any inside knowledge as to who the sources are.

@wikileaks "name Specialist Bradley Manning, the soldier being held in a US military jail, as the alleged source" wtf. bored? @guardian

@exiledsurfer "name Specialist Bradley Manning, the soldier being held in a US military jail, as the alleged source" @wikileaks

@exiledsurfer also was zum deibel regt sich @wikileaks schon wieder auf, da steht deutlich "alleged". ist dem langweilig oder schaukampf?

@exiledsurfer oder will der nur am ende dem wl-süchtigen greg zu etwas stoff für heute verhelfen...? @wikileaks

@Paige2u ...but... for a journo job first @wikileaks has to learn correct quoting (see last wrong quote from @guardian ) YEAH needs training

@wikinews030 agree with you completely. Better ensure it's correct before distro.

@Paige2u erm yeah and this time it was more than just a typo. last time we were hunting the retweeters (funny talks resulted), now

@Paige2u now we don't take THAT much of effort but it's astonishing. there's "alleged" in the sentence, so wtf.

@wikinews030 I'm like u i don't want assumptions or opinions I want facts. It will all work out I'm sure.

@Paige2u thought about possible aims/reasons: a) bored? b) showfight? c) just pure attention in order to let greg get some extra lines? wtf

@wikinews030 this is a very very interesting interview and he is handling himself VERY well. Why only prosecute wikileaks and not NY times?

@Paige2u erm no. nonono. IF, then ONLY the @nytimes (let's take @nytjim for it) - he has at least an US ID :] (#wikileaks )

@wikileaks absolute pack of lies against the Guardian. Manning not our source. Who says "free Bradley" on their logo?# Wikileaks does

@wikileaks Absolute lie from #wikileaks. Manning not our source. What is it Assange fears in Guardian book that makes him lie? Disappointing

Is this guy for real? @davidleigh3 #Assange puts "Free Bradley" on #wikileaks logo, thus naming source. #Guardian book does no such thing

@AnonQC @davidleigh3 ?? what has a support logo of this kind to do with "source naming"? (btw late enough,this. were also waiting for $ long

#Assange puts "Free Bradley" on #wikileaks logo, thus naming his source. #Guardian book does no such thing gu.com/p/2mnxe/tw

@wikileaks All the #guardian book says abt bradley manning is already in public domain. Of course we don't name a "source". Why Lie, Julian?

@wikileaks Why lie, Julian? You won't go to heaven if you lie about the #Guardian book. gu.com/p/2mnxe/tw You'll go somewhere else

@skdadl @WikiLeaks I'm genuinely upset that people should tell spiteful lies. Nothing about Manning in #Guardian book except public domain

@Maxwrh @wikileaks It's just a flat Assange lie. I don't mind debate. I hate spite about #Guardian book http://bit.ly/wikileaksbook

@sunny_hundal We didn't point out Manning leaked. Wired mag did. US Army indicted him. It can't affect his plight. Assange got him arrested

@sunny_hundal @jamesrbuk @lukeharding1968 No, it's not "evidence" to repeat Manning public domain material. Evidence is direct knowledge