Science Writing in the Age of Denial (recap, part 1)
The University of Wisconsin-Madison assembled a roster of science-writing all-stars to consider the roots of the public's resistance to accepting the science about evolution, climate change, vaccines, and other matters.
- The University of Wisconsin-Madison made its goals for the event clear in the description listed on its website at sciencedenial.wisc.edu:Science writers now work in an age where uncomfortable ideas and truths meet organized resistance. Opposing scientific consensus on such things as anthropogenic climate change, the theory of evolution, and even the astonishingly obvious benefits of vaccination has become politically de rigueur, a litmus test and a genuine threat to science. How does denial affect the craft of the science writer? How can science writers effectively explain disputed science? What’s the big picture? Are denialists ever right?
Welcome and Introduction
Science writer par excellence Deborah Blum of UW-M welcomed the audience at the event's start and introduced some of those making it possible. University chancellor David Ward considered the tensions between science and irrationality, modernity and anti-modernity, inclusive pluralism vs. ideological pluralization.David Krakauer, the head of the relatively new Wisconsin Institute for Discovery (the venue for the day's discussions), then pointed out that all of us engage in our own forms of denial. For example, journalists covering the denial of climate warming et al. fooled themselves into thinking that they could change public opinion. For decades, Krakauer noted, popular films had carried the message that we ignore scientists' warnings at our peril, yet the public still had this distrust of scientists.- David Krakauer: the science communicator's denial? That the work makes a difference. #sciencedenial
- David Krakauer: "If Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott have failed, what can science writers do?" #sciencedenial
- But journalists aren't the only ones.
- David Krakauer: "The departmental reward systems are inadequate for the (energy) challenge we face." #sciencedenial
- David Krakauer: "The (metaphorical) asteroid is coming. And what are we doing? Nothing." #sciencedenial
- "We're actually in the age of denial - of the end." John Krakauer #sciencedenial
Communicating Science in Politicized Environments
Arthur Lupia, professor of political science at the University of Michigan, kicked off the session with an energetic and engrossing review of what biology and psychology had discovered about the challenges of making complex arguments to diverse audiences. The fleeting, fragmented nature of human attention and the phenomenon of "motivated reasoning" almost guarantee that people will not absorb and accept upsetting information unless it speaks meaningfully to their priorities and values.- Lupia: Familiar communication plan is that if we give people right info, they will make the right decisions. But often fails #sciencedenial
- Lupia: The problem is us, not them. We have unrealistic expectations about how they'll react to info. #sciencedenial
#sciencedenial Lupia: science comms don't understand their audiences http://pic.twitter.com/9CYMtp4r- Lupia: sci comunicators need to stop blaming "them" for #sciencedenial because it absolves us of the need to find better approaches.
- Lupia - to get audience out of the "woods" you need to know the woods, and where they are. Need their perspective. #sciencedenial
- Lupia: Persuading audiences involves battles over attention, elaboration (what "they" should believe) and credibility. #sciencedenial
- Lupia: Human brain has very limited capacity for attention. Communicators compete with *everything* else in audience's head. #sciencedenial
- Lupia: "What I'm talking about right now is competing with...what I'm talking about right now...and right now." #sciencedenial
- Lupia: "Almost everything you attend to disappears a second after you attend to it. Whatever you say must really prevail." #sciencedenial
- Lupia: To get a message to stick with audience, have to speak to aspirations and fears on their level. #sciencedenial
- Lupia: Long-term memory requires elaboration. Perceptions of urgency and efficacy fuel cognitive effort. #sciencedenial
- Lupia: Attention is an opportunity to leave a cognitive legacy, don't blow it. Show urgency and efficacy. #sciencedenial
- Lupia. Non-science audiences want info that is close, immediate, concrete. Outcome must be possible to achieve. #sciencedenial
- Want relatable threads people can connect to. Then, they'll follow the bigger story (like climate change) - Lupia #sciencedenial
- Lupia: Motivated reasoning is what we all do, nearly all the time. Seek to make new evidence consistent w/ prior views. #sciencedenial
- my motivated reasoning primer in Mother Jones, quoting Lupia #sciencedenial motherjones.com/politics/2011/…














