I happen to have that research right here, Mr Keller

The day sociologist Zeynep Tufekci dropped a bundle of knowledge on the New York Times's Bill Keller (with help from Twitter and a whole lot of scholarship)

  1. My interview with @NYTimes Executive Editor @nytkeller http://soup.ps/ip4fCs
  2. Bill Keller tells @antderosa that he doesn't actually think Twitter makes you stupid: http://is.gd/BRZsXF -- whew! what a relief :-)
  3. Keller also says he doesn't tweet that much because he doesn't want to give away story ideas to competitors: http://is.gd/BRZsXF
  4. UMBC's Tufekci, though, wasn't all that relieved that Keller seemed to be walking back "Twitter makes you stupid." 


    Instead, she took direct aim at Keller's new claim about the limits/costs of social media: "The time you spend keeping up with your 200 Facebook friends is time you are not getting to know someone really well in person." 

  5. .@nytkeller: time spent on "your 200 Facebook friends" is at expense of "in person" sociality. Research says otherwise. http://is.gd/BRZsXF
  6. Online is 'virtual' while offline is 'real' distinction is outdated. Does not reflect current social practices of most. It's just wrong.
  7. Most people's most Facebook "friends" are their friends & acquaintances. Most of the time is spent on closer friends, just like "real" life.
  8. TV, suburbs, long workdays, dual-earner couples is what makes ppl have less time w/ friends+family. Facebook is the opposite dynamic.
  9. Note: not just a dismissal! Not just conjecture! Not even "just" a refutation! An alternative hypothesis with better support from the data. 

    In just four tweets. Ka-pow. 
  10. .@techsoc Who needs research when you can rely on intuition and stereotypes?
  11. 1993 called & wants its stereotypes back from @nytkeller. RT @nancybaym: Who needs research when you can rely on intuition & stereotypes?
  12. Now, Bill Keller doesn't tweet much. And he almost never engages with critics, especially outside the Times. In his interview with Keller, De Rosa points out to Keller that he [De Rosa] "was the only non-New York Times staffer you ever replied to in over two years over Twitter." 

  13. But something in Tufecki's tweets -- perhaps the boldness, perhaps the unmistakable aura of a deliberate, well-developed argument -- must have caught Mr. Keller's attention. 
  14. So the Times' executive editor asked for more. And boy, did he get it.
  15. Yes. Here's non-paywalled article from @mysocnet http://bit.ly/kRelbB @nytkeller: @techsoc Um, did you plan on linking to the research?
  16. .@nytkeller "use of certain 'social media' - were .. associated w/ having a larger number of confidants" --this after regression controls.
  17. IOW, after many factors (race, gender, educ) statistically equalized, people who used more social media like FB had more very close ties.
  18. .@nytkeller My earlier paper (college age, not national) finds same number of friends b/w users & non-users of FB. http://bit.ly/lX897d
  19. .@nytkeller Nationally-representative sample, @barrywellman & Wang: http://bit.ly/lTOHPV Either no diff or heavy net-users have more friends
  20. Correction, sorry. RT @mubaraketganen: @mysocnet @nytkeller there was an extra RT at the end of the link, this works http://bit.ly/acnWcM
  21. .@nytkeller Jeffrey Boase study from 2006 about email. Email users had more close ties than non-users. http://bit.ly/acjJYj
  22. .@nytkeller I have detailed but old anaylsis of Gen. Social Survey 04 (probably best soc. science survey ) -under review- w/ similar results
  23. .@nytkeller, latest @pewinternet by @mysocnet http://bit.ly/jphw7B. Need to look at regressions. No effect of FB or Twitter on network size.

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Tim Carmody

I write about technology & media for Wired.com's Epicenter & sometimes the magazine. Resident bookfuturist at Snarkmarket. Recovering PhD. Dad.

Total views
4,448

Storify

@Storify