Hello iPad user! You should definitelydownload and try our free iPad app!

Published

As to

Do you have any objections as to the use of 'as to'?

  1. caffyrelf
    Quick question: do you object to the "as to" in "without causing any confusion as to the meaning", and if so, why? What would you prefer?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  2. caffyrelf
    @nickminers That's what I've changed it to, after objections were raised. I'm just wondering how widespread the objections are!
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  3. 0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  4. SnoozeInBrief
    @caffyrelf Can't stand it - almost as bad as 'in relation to'! Clumsy faux formalism that's afraid of ordinary prepositions. Try 'about'.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  5. caffyrelf
    @SnoozeInBrief Ooh, strident! I've gone for 'over' - I don't think 'about the meaning' quite works.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  6. Jacob_Funnell
    @caffyrelf I don't think it matters. The only time it would be a problem is if it were liberally repeated, but that applies to all words.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  7. grouchotendency
    @caffyrelf I'd probably use "over" 'cos "as to" sounds a bit bureaucratese to me. Just personal preference though
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  8. MathewJLyons
    @caffyrelf I don't mind "as to", though it's a bit pompous. Was it written by a man who wears a bow tie?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  9. SnoozeInBrief
    @caffyrelf Yeah, I keep vaguely meaning to blog about preposition abuse but the red mist makes me inarticulate! And yes, 'over's better.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  10. caffyrelf
    @catordog2 Superfluous it may be, though I find it gentler to include it. But change the sentence entirely? How?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  11. caffyrelf
    @grouchotendency Yep, that's what I've done, but it's a new one on me. Always good to learn new irritations!
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  12. catordog2
    @caffyrelf it shifts the emphasis and could make the 'as to' unnecessary. Depends on what follows it.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  13. MathewJLyons
    @caffyrelf *removes foot from mouth* Well, some people can carry them off. You and Matt Smith both?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  14. catordog2
    @caffyrelf fair play. It is a very interesting question nonetheless. Look forward to your blog. Over and out.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  15. sshingler
    @caffyrelf Absolutely. Horrid. Makes one sound like a Copper. "without confusing" is usually fine. Another ugly syntax: "in terms of..."
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!
Total views
40