Hostess Closing

I didn't have a lot of time to write much on the Hostess closing this morning, but a lot of my Twitter crew had really good things to say, so I'm storifying.

  1. Lots of people falling for Hostess' framing on plant closures w/o reading. Almost as if there were wholesomeness at stake, anywhere.
  2. The story of Hostess is a company closing because it can't get its workers to work for peanuts. Not sad. http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/11/16/business/16reuters-hostess-bankruptcy.html?smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0
  3. Well, it's a sad story that an iconic brand can't pay workers decently, but I'm not feeling for the bosses' claims of "necessity."
  4. I say this as the biggest Twinkies fan alive: if you can't pay/treat folks right, Hostess, your product is totally worthless.
  5. @sarahljaffe They will sell the assets and in a few months the brand will be back with low cost labor :( So long America)
  6. @sarahljaffe Sad that 18k people are going to be out of work because management couldn’t manage an iconic brand, though.
  7. @sarahljaffe the back story is the leverage the powers used to drive the company in the ground. Blame the unions they say, no one will know.
  8. Oh my god that's the best hashtag ever. RT @MichaelEONeil: @sarahljaffe Give the business to the workers! #TwinkiesandRoses
  9. It isn't the union's fault that Hostess came up with a business model that couldn't sustain paying workers an honest wage.
  10. Really looking forward to the auction for Hostess' patents. Patents! Twinkie patents?!?!
  11. Me. RT @price_laborecon: So who else thinks Drum and Yglesias will run with Hostess as an example of what is wrong with unions.
  12. The Hostess liquidation is the #1 trending topic on Twitter. I hope all #1u groups combine resources to push back on their PR.
  13. If you can possibly read my words as saying that the workers are "better off unemployed," you don't know the first thing about labor.
  14. @sarahljaffe I woke up, saw the ap article, and wondered what your reaction would be. Generally, I'm anti-union, but I agree with you here.
  15. RT @TAWexler: @sarahljaffe there is no same reason to fire 18,500 workers because you suck at managing a company.
  16. @sarahljaffe @TAWexler Correction: They are not "managing" that company. They are wrenching short-term profits from that company.
  17. The Hostess thing reminds me of Jeremy Brecher's argument in Strike. Post-Wagner action is restrained, limiting power bit.ly/RHaf7U

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Sarah Jaffe

Journalist. Rabblerouser. Co-host of Dissent magazine's Belabored podcast. #classwar instigator. My opinions and foul mouth are my own. Not a musician.

Total views
984

Storify

@Storify