And from our new Google+ page:

Productive Web Apps -  I think so, I find that the Google+ feed is the stuff I actually want to see. Most of my facebook feed is spammy now!

Luis Miguel -  What's that?

Histerius -  Yes, FB went way too far, I don't like that at all.

Redwan Huq-  Facebook has habitually stepped over the line for privacy. In the words of Charlie Murphy, Facebook is a habitual line-stepper.

David Abraham -  Yes, at least as implemented. Machine-gun to the foot IMO.

Dario de Souza Beio Marques -  Please define too far , because what FB has done equates to the birth of a digital big brother, or might I say: Big Zucker is watching you...watch others

https://plus.google.com/u/0/106352275471397691972/posts/j7mFTSMVZGy

[Edit]: it is not frictionless sharing, it is frictionless spamming.

Barbol Carmichael -  Facebook went too far long ago.

Alessandro Mencarini -  Frictionless sharing is an interesting concept, but in its current implementation it will bury good content under a pile of half-listened songs, half-read articles and so on.

Sam Carson -  Many people focus on the privacy issues. I think it is also too far because it is actually boring. Being forced to be a peeping tom on what Guardian articles people are reading isn't particularly insightful. The vetting process of choosing the share ensured there is some usefulness behind the intent to share.

Ron Rieneckert -  I agree with Alessandro & Sam. 

Sometime in the past few months, my Facebook news feed became more noise than signal. Very little of it is actually relevant to me any longer, so I've all but stopped checking it. 

Not all of this irrelevancy is because of 'frictionless sharing', but it sure isn't helping.