I Can't Stand It: @mnemonictheatre vs @nestruck

A Twitter debate over an idea ovation innovation: Asking audiences to please stay seated unless "incredibly satisfied". Vancouver's Mnemonic Theatre proposes; Globe and Mail critic J. Kelly Nestruck disposes. What do you think?

  1. @broadwaybabyto @wyl81 @@nestruck @tinarasmussen | AN IDEA TO REMEDY "THE COMPULSORY CANADIAN STANDING O" | ow.ly/hB4sS Thoughts?
  2. I've said it before I'll say it again just never want to underestimate the audience @mnemonictheatre @broadwaybabyto @wyl81 @nestruck
  3. @mnemonictheatre Perhaps you should include a program note on when and how to laugh and cry. Or perform to robots.
  4. @nestruck so you think it's a terrible idea I'm assuming? Just trying to find something constructive.
  5. @nestruck I think it makes the audience part of the process: Curtain call as comment card. I'm interested to see how my audiences respond.
  6. @mnemonictheatre I like idea of inviting honest feedback, we're accustomed to being polite & not say anything
  7. @mnemonictheatre The audience is always part of the process. You're actually taking agency away from them.
  8. @nestruck not sure I follow. How does saying "we want your honest feedback in this way to influence our art" distance audience from process?
  9. @mnemonictheatre Nothing wrong with surveying your audience. Choreographing the way they respond is silly, however...
  10. @nestruck I'm thinking it will allow audiences to be more critical of the art they see and deepen their opinions in its regard.
  11. @mnemonictheatre Hmmm... Maybe it's not up to you to decide how audiences engage with art.
  12. @nestruck I think it's up to the theatre creator to allow for forms of engagement such as this. We live in an interactive age. Besides...
  13. @nestruck we're not telling the audience HOW to respond. But rather how their response will be INTERPRETED as raw data for future work.
  14. @mnemonictheatre Again, the irony is that you are actually taking away interactivity by dictating how spectators should respond at curtain.
  15. @mnemonictheatre Don't turn me into data, diminish my response by turning me into a three-point scale.
  16. @nestruck I don't see much of a difference to this three point scale as you call it and the star or thumb system used by theatre critics.
  17. @mnemonictheatre At least I get four stars... But, nevertheless, your audience is not comprised of theatre critics.
  18. @mnemonictheatre One of the great joys of going to the theatre for fun, for me, is not having to come up with a reductive rating...
  19. @mnemonictheatre ... and being able to keep my opinion to myself. Your audience doesn't owe you a review or a data set or whatever it is.
  20. @nestruck but you ARE a critic. So your theatre experience is different than the average theatre goer. Theatre shouldn't be made for critics
  21. @mnemonictheatre Exactly! But you want to turn your audience into theatre critics. And the worst kind.
  22. @nestruck they should be made for audiences that don't get to voice their opinion as opening and readily as critics do.
  23. @nestruck the only difference between the ave. theatre goer and the critic is that the critic has a forum for expressing an opinion...
  24. @mnemonictheatre No, the only difference is that a critic *has* to voice an opinion, usually in a prescribed format.

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Storify

@Storify