From archival silence to glorious data

How do you use digital methods to analyze the *gaps* in the archive?

  1. interesting analysis of long 18thC texts in this article, but I'm still concerned abt gender in the corpus: bit.ly/AeZul7
  2. btw, that's an article from the latest issue of Romanticism & Victorianism on the Net
  3. article gets its texts from g-books, ECCO, Project g & LION but replicates the lit canon w/few women. we need to fix this b4 extrapolating
  4. @rogerwhitson take a look at the appendix of sample texts: who among them is a women author? Baillie? who else?
  5. @rogerwhitson if we're going to do this large scale stuff, we have to ack that not enuf women authors' wrks r digitized
  6. @triproftri You'd think that using methods like this would make it easier to not replicate white male canons.
  7. @rogerwhitson ah, but we haven't funded enuf dig projs for women authors to equal those on male authors
  8. @rogerwhitson and certainly g-books for 19thc doesn't cover nearly enuf of those so-called "ephemeral" pubs
  9. @triproftri hrmmm...prob w/ methods of digitization? Perhaps interesting to look at how G digitized the texts.
  10. @rogerwhitson well g digitized from spec collect libraries; some of those lib have policy *not* to collect ephemeral stuff
  11. @triproftri So we're still dealing with institutional methods of preservation.
  12. @rogerwhitson yep, unfortunately. but now it's hidden behind all of this glorious data.
  13. @triproftri Frustrating that new methods like DH repeat some of the mistakes of the past. Makes me think #transformdh has a point.
  14. @rogerwhitson dh methods r exciting, don't get me wrong. but let's not do "see how everyone writes" query until we get a better balance
  15. @rogerwhitson bc then all we're doing is asking "how do men write?" funding for the labor behind digitizing & markup isn't innovative
  16. @triproftri absolutely. This is why Dhers have to be critical of how corpuses are put together. IMO, that's what we can contribute to it.
  17. @triproftri Wonder if there's a way to use DH methods to uncover the hidden biases in projects like this - or in GoogleBooks, etc.
  18. @triproftri I just don't know how we would build a corpus. Or what that would look like.
  19. @rogerwhitson me either. but how abt in dh we start by acknowledging that there's a gender bias? at least in access to 19th c texts
  20. and there you go. Shades of @spikenlilli 's #dhdebates essay in that spirited convo w/@rogerwhitson
  21. @triproftri Acknowledging is fine and important, but I'd like to create something that would visualize it, mk it obvious.
  22. @rogerwhitson i'm not even sure how to create that considering we're discussing texts that we may not even know abt?
  23. @rogerwhitson I am watching. Ironically not participating b/c I'm writing up an essay on same. cc @triproftri

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Natalia Cecire

American modernism, naturalism, experimental lit, history and philosophy of science, gender, childhood, and media studies.

Total views
594

Storify

@Storify