1. New post: "Contra John Taylor" blog.supplysideliberal.com/post/417857838… My reply to John Taylor's WSJ op-ed this morning, backing up my critical tweet.
  2. My latest on Quartz: "John Taylor is wrong: the Fed is not causing another recession." qz.com/48696/john-tay… Also see blog.supplysideliberal.com/post/417857838…
  3. @Noahpinion i don't understand the criticism to the 'low interest rates fuel specilation argument'. Why is that inconsistent with any model?
  4. @Esguitos @Noahpinion In a perfectly rational model, with no asymmetric information, any speculation in the model is a good thing.
  5. @mileskimball 2. Speculative search for yield. I see it daily because I work with ACTUAL INVESTORS, not just emperical models
  6. .@ClayNickel Thanks! What I gather from what you say is that QE causes a bit of an uproar for those in the financial industry. Is that fair?
  7. We need more in the way of formal economic models of "reaching for yield." What are the best models out there so far? Any links?
  8. .@ClayNickel I believe "reaching for yield" is real. My claim in blog.supplysideliberal.com/post/417857838… is that grokking requires a behavioral finance model.
  9. @mileskimball: RFY is entire point of Fed action. QE3 is Fed RFY to drive asset prices (eg homes) up. But RFY != "speculation".
  10. Now I am doubting the reality of "reaching for yield" if I define it as risk premia being lower when nominal interest rates are low.
  11. The way people tell the story about reaching for yield, it is as if people are willing to accept a lower risk premium when rates are low.
  12. Do people really accept lower risk premia when nominal rates are low (e.g. due to nominal illusion)? If not, what is reaching for yield?
  13. Is "reaching for yield" just another way of saying people respond to the risk premium (gap between expected risky return and safe rate)?
  14. If "reaching for yield" is a name for the normal response to the risk premium, then it isn't much of a "low rates cause speculation" story.
  15. @mileskimball: The Fed forces down risk premia for long term rate risk. That pushes down other risk premia.
  16. @mileskimball Out of my depth here, but I figured the concept was that investors have a "set point" for the yield they're after (1/2)
  17. @mileskimball and seeking that set point during period of low rates means that they unwittingly end up in different risk category. (2/2)
  18. @mileskimball For pension funds there is. Their accounting and funding rules give them every incentive to do just that
  19. .@mileskimball I think “reaching for yield” is risk-seeking behavior, eg to cover up insolvency, either irrationally or by agents.
  20. By “Reaching For Yield” Do You Mean “Demand Curves Slope Downward” forbes.com/sites/modeledb…
  21. @mileskimball I totally agree that the behavioral route needs more research. My notion is just an alternative -k
  22. .@cconces @ModeledBehavior John Taylor is claiming "reaching for yield" is a problem. Your model can't give John what he needs for his arg.

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Miles Kimball

Professor of Economics and Survey Research at the University of Michigan

Total views
66

Storify

@Storify