Making (in) the Digital Humanities
I was writing up a thing today, a thing about "values in design," and was thinking about how I've oft heard the "Digital Humanities is about making things," but . So I decided to ask DHe twitter internets and see what they thought.
- Word is bond.
- Time to dig into the MLA twitter archive: archive.mla12.org/tweets/
- Borgman 2009 poses the question "Whose problem is it to...design, develop, and deploy the scholarly infrastructure for digital humanities?" In response she cites Drucker: "Leaving it to 'them' is unfair, wrongheaded, and irresponsible. Them is us" from her Chronicle article "Blind Spots: Humanists must plan their digital future."
Borgman 2009 - http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html …Drucker 2009 - http://chronicle.com/article/Blind-Spots/9348 …She also talk about this during a Digital Humanities session at the iConference in Toronto. I have notes I should type up...when I have time?
- The UCLA link to the Manifesto has been broken for some time, but we found a living URL.
- A trio of excellent blog posts:
Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to like or comment.