Evan Williams on Twitter and its ecosystem

  1. @mathewi "virtually all of the network’s power and growth has come from outside the company itself"—a common myth but completely overblown
  2. @ev: fair enough -- would you say a majority? or any at all? I'm thinking of key features like the hashtag, @ mentions, retweets, etc.
  3. @mathewi Absolutely, the ideas that led to those features came from usage (not unusual, BTW). Not sure how/if that means "power and growth."
  4. @ev: my argument -- and it's just an argument -- is that those features and third-party apps fueled a lot of Twitter's growth. you disagree?
  5. @mathewi "A lot" is hard to argue with. But your conflating features, which were designed and built into Twitter, not taken whole cloth...
  6. @mathewi ...and third-party apps is stretching my ability to respond in <140. In a nutshell, both are important...but widely exaggerated.
  7. @mathewi I think the "Twitter was made by third party things" is mostly nerd triumphalism, not factual. Shaq did more than any indie app.
  8. @Besvinick @anildash: I agree -- but the influence of third-party apps, which I think was important, was only part of my point.
  9. @anildash @mathewi 3rd party apps = better than Twitter's site for a long time. I prefer them, & so did the power users who sent most tweets
  10. @mathewi @anildash I think 3rd party apps have been more critical to enterprise adoption, which is arguably more important than consumer
  11. @ev: it's possible that the influence of both those things has been exaggerated -- but I don't think they should be underplayed either
  12. @mathewi Well, there's no risk of that, given the kinds of statements you and other commentators make, which no one thinks to question.
  13. @ev: which is why I am glad to have you question them :-) I'd be interested in a longer view from you about the topic as well
  14. @ev @HilzFuld: some fairly crucial features, and all -- or at least most -- of the best apps. that has to have a pretty powerful effect.
  15. @ev @mathewi 3rd-party innovation doesn't just mean apps and tags. Users negotiated a raison d'etre for @twitter that it couldn't have led.
  16. @mathewi @ev @hilzfuld Sure, @chrismessina thought up hashtags, but others did slashtags, etc. Only Twitter's adoption made them meaningful.
  17. @anildash @chrismessina @mathewi @ev @blaine Similarly for @ to address users, which was common on BBS, forums & IRC long before Twitter.
  18. @ev @mathewi Suspect that much of the push-back comes from the disruption of the Twitter ecosystem. Ironic, no?
  19. @anildash @ev: yes, Twitter's adoption made them meaningful -- but what would there be if those features had not emerged?
  20. @anildash @ev: totally agree -- I am saying one would not have happened without the other, not that one is all-important.
  21. @mathewi @anildash Who knows what there would be, but it's not like we were sitting around with no ideas.
  22. @mathewi @anildash This is how products evolve. You have 1M ideas—some come from usage, some from inside. You pick and choose carefully.
  23. @ev @anildash: and I agree, that process of picking and implementing is crucial. I am not trying to denigrate that in any way
  24. @mathewi It's hubristic for me to not give users all the credit, I realize. But it's naive for you to not recognize the Twitter team's role.
  25. @ev: I'm not saying users deserve all the credit -- just trying to put recent events and the backlash into context, and that is part of it

Did you find this story interesting? or comment as 4 already did!

Liked!

Mathew Ingram

I'm a senior writer at GigaOm, a former journalist with the Globe and Mail and co-founder of the mesh conference in Toronto

Total views
3,304

Storify

@Storify