1. @hblodget my objection is i don't see the benefits for us doing the work that's then aggregated.
  2. @hblodget this piece was result of knowing colleen for 8 years. copy and pasting the juicy bits = 15 mins or work. digiday.com/agencies/why-i…
  3. the pageview ad system is driving a media aggregation economy that can stink for original content creators. bit.ly/Uty5cn
  4. @bmorrissey In the old days (5 years ago), publications paid PR people to try to get other pubs to write about their stories.
  5. @bmorrissey They didn't do this for return "traffic" (there was none). They just did it for publicity.
  6. @bmorrissey Our perspective is that we are thrilled when anyone writes about our stuff. We are honestly grateful for being "aggregated"
  7. @hblodget but that's not my model. my point is why is everyone opted in to this aggregation model?
  8. @bmorrissey There are a billion sources of information online, and readers only see a handful. So the more exposure, the better.
  9. @hblodget i get that's YOUR model. it's not ours. maybe we'll change if i find evidence it works to build a long-term brand.
  10. @bmorrissey If you don't want us to write about your work, we won't. Last thing we want to do is frustrate you.
  11. @bmorrissey I would again respectfully suggest that you get value from having people discuss/share your work. But if you disagree, no prob
  12. @hblodget that's a false choice. nobody will discuss our work unless you copy and paste large parts of it?
  13. @bmorrissey But to be very clear on this: If you do not want us to alert our readers to your articles, we won't. Full stop.
  14. @bmorrissey I would again suggest, very respectfully, that we helped create a lot more awareness of your work, beyond your audience.
  15. @bmorrissey It's all perspective. Murdoch thinks Google News bad because he used to be only gatekeeper. We LOVE Google News--sends readers!
  16. @hblodget i get the 'promiscuous' theory. i don't see long term benefit. i want a particular set of readers. you don't drive many of them.
  17. @hblodget i love mediagazer and other places that drive traffic. linkedin? i LOVE linkedin to death.
  18. @hblodget i don't believe the aggregation model, as BI practices it, benefits the end creator to nearly the degree it does BI. #s don't lie.
  19. @bmorrissey Does it "benefit the end creator" as much as the NYT when the NYT writes about a WSJ scoop? Or CNN reports Reuters news?
  20. @bmorrissey Fair to say you assign zero value to publicizing your work and introducing it to non-Digiday readers? (Honest question)
  21. @hblodget nope, if you go to the cases i cite, i would like your take on where BI added real value.
  22. @bmorrissey I ask that because we think there's a lot of value in others writing about our work--whether or not we get direct traffic back
  23. @hblodget people will discuss our work if it's good, doesn't matter really if BI copy and pastes large parts of it.
  24. @hblodget and i get you guys think differently, but when did all publishers get opted in to this system?
  25. @bmorrissey When someone links to us and sends readers, those are readers we would not have gotten. That's helpful! So we are grateful!

Did you find this story interesting? or comment as 1 already did!

Liked!

Mathew Ingram

I'm a senior writer at GigaOm, a former journalist with the Globe and Mail and co-founder of the mesh conference in Toronto

Total views
374

Storify

@Storify