Richard Horton on WHO on Twitter

His posts ~8-9p US time 26 Jan 2012

  1. My WHO re-education began tonight. You may not agree with what follows. But these are the sincere views of one senior WHO scientist.
  2. WHO is no longer a science-based organisation. WHO believes that scientists within the agency should be anonymous bureaucrats.
  3. Science in WHO is seen as a dangerously subversive activity. Publication in journals brings the threat of disciplinary action.
  4. WHO prefers censorship to communication. People are judged by how little they do, not by how much they achieve.
  5. Relations between staff and leadership are bad. WHO is too defensive. Fine words are not turned into effective actions.
  6. WHO "reform" has still not delivered a coherent strategy. What are the agency's priority initiatives? Nobody knows.
  7. WHO departments are fatally "compromised" by donor funding. The worst offenders are the US government and the BMGF.

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Maryn McKenna

Author of SUPERBUG & BEATING BACK THE DEVIL. Wired blogger, SciAm columnist, magazine writer. Public health, global health, food policy. Also @MRSA_blog.

Total views
446

Storify

@Storify