Science

Scientists and outreach #scio13 #sciout

Selected tweets and conversations relevant to the science outreach sessions ScienceOnline2013. http://scio13.wikispaces.com/Scientists+and+Outreach

  1. Introducing the Scientists and Outreach session at #scio13
  2. The #scio13 sessions @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste @mpgroome & I are cooking up on outreach will rise above scientist-blaming &create resources.
  3. @kejames @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste @mpgroome So this means we can't just go on blaming the scientists in one session, journalists the next?
  4. @David_Dobbs @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste @mpgroome In our sessions, journalists will be just 1 of many channels for scientists to do outreach.
  5. Discussing Russo (2010).
  6. Great piece on sci communication for researchers: bit.ly/Ucqxca Not sure how I missed this before. #scio13 @kejames @MiriamGoldste
  7. That piece emphasizes what always gets emphasized: media relations. There R many other ways 2 do outreach. @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste #scio13
  8. @kejames excellent point. Media relations been best way to get out info but blogs, twitter seems to be changing that. I'm also fan of 1-1
  9. Scientists who engage with society perform better academically http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oup/spp/2008/00000035/00000007/art00006?token=004d12a754573d2570257045233e6c7c3151765b2b677c4e7547543c7e386f642f466f73d17c4 (free) @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste #scio13
  10. @genegeek I'd even lump blogging and tweeting in with media relations as one of the things that always gets emphasized. 1/2
  11. @genegeek 2/2 But there's even more. 1:1 as you mentioned, & also citizen science, public lectures (e.g. science cafes), school visits, etc.
  12. @kejames I'm completely amazed by the number of people my blog reaches. I think communicating science on a smaller scale is underrated.
  13. @kejames I agree. I separate blogging/twitter because to me feels more like 1-1 = no intermediaries btw scientist & audience
  14. @kejames @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste But surely none that have the same [number of people reached]/[time spent] ratio? Genuine Q. #scio13
  15. Old paper but new to me: Scientists who engage with society perform better academically http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oup/spp/2008/00000035/00000007/art00006?token=004d12a754573d2570257045233e6c7c3151765b2b677c4e7547543c7e386f642f466f73d17c4 HT @kejames
  16. but career impact is absent. RT @edyong209 Scientists who engage with society perform better academically http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oup/spp/2008/00000035/00000007/art00006?token=004d12a754573d2570257045233e6c7c3151765b2b677c4e7547543c7e386f642f466f73d17c4 … HT @kejames
  17. .@edyong209 @kejames An important paper b/c the perception among many academics (particularly the old guard) is that the effect is negative
  18. @edyong209 @kejames @MiriamGoldste I agree. Working w/news media significantly improves reach. But...(1/2)
  19. @edyong209 @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste Yes, but we must also factor in things besides simply being reached, like length and depth of effect.
  20. @edyong209 @kejames @MiriamGoldste (2/2)...reaches broad, rather than targeted audience. Shotgun approach, if you will.
  21. @edyong209 @ShipLives @MiriamGoldste So ([number of people reached]x[impact per reachee])/[time spent]?

Did you find this story interesting? or comment as 1 already did!

Liked!

Karen James

Biologist, outdoorswoman, aspiring explorer, space enthusiast, evolution booster, atheist, alpine pilgrim. The mind is a chaos of delight.—Charles Darwin

Total views
191

Storify

@Storify