Hello iPad user! You should definitelydownload and try our free iPad app!

Published

The protest against SOPA/PIPA #SOPAstrike

On january 18th thousands of websites went dark in protest against the SOPA and PIPA bills. As it turns out, it worked. Here's how.

  1. «End piracy, not liberty». This motto on the Google 'take action' page, retwitted and posted thousands of times, sums up the main concern of those who protested against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect Ip Act (PIPA) on january 18th: the Congress and Senate, respectively, should not allow a restriction of Internet freedom in the name of copyright law. 
  2. Even though concerns about the bills are not new (even the White House spoke out against their DNS filtering provision), the #SOPAstrike initiative took them to a whole new level, convincing millions of people to sign a petition against SOPA and PIPA, making crucial websites like Wikipedia (but also Reddit, Boingboing and many others) go dark for 24 hours and even getting Google to censor its logo and link the reasons against the bills on its homepage. 
  3. Both Google and Wikipedia provided data that help making sense of the proportions of the protest: more than 4 million petition signatures, 8.000 links for 'SOPA blackout' search, plus the Wikipedia blackout page reached by 162 million users. 
  4. As a result, here is how the web looked like for a day:
  5. But how did it all start? The protest gained momentum as Jimmy Wales, on January 16th, announced on Twitter that, after thorough deliberation, Wikipedia decided to join the strike in full:
  6. 0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  7. Megan Garber, on the Atlantic, later explained how the decision came about:
  8. And Twitter? Will it join the protest in the same way as Wikipedia announced it would? Alex Howard tweeted the question:
  9. digiphile
    @jayrosen_nyu It's not clear if @dickc @finkd or @ericschmidt have the cojones to take users where @davidkarp or @Jimmy_Wales & co have/will
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  10. Dick Costolo, CEO at Twitter, replied:
  11. dickc
    @digiphile @jayrosen_nyu that's just silly. Closing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  12. To many, this meant a direct reference (and critique) to Wikipedia. Wales asked for clarifications: 
  13. jimmy_wales
    @dickc Can you confirm your support for Wikipedia's protest? I agree with you that twitter should not go dark.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  14. And clarifications came from Twitter:
  15. dickc
    @jimmy_wales was only referring to Twitter in response to explicit tweet suggesting we lacked courage for not shutting down.....
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  16. dickc
    @jimmy_wales ...I don't INTENTIONALLY make value judgements about organizations for which I don't have full context.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  17. On the 17th Google too decided to join the protest, even if in a different way:

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!
Total views
503