#onsci: What's in store for science in 2012 - Part 2

The first #onsci chat for 2012 was broad and fast, so we've broken it into chunks. Part 2 covers 'open access' which started as a 'big thing for science in 2012' from Q2 and then went on to be a question on it's own.

  1. The discussion on open access started as a side conversation during question 2, persisted though question 3 on science education (see Part 3) and then was addressed specifically in question 4. The discussion started with some general comments about open access. (For those not sure what open access is, here's the link to wikipedia's entry.)
  2. @onsci accessibility of science, access to publicly funded research, community's engagement with science other than medical research #onsci
  3. @upulie yes yes yes. open access and it's impact on funding will be huge this year Q2 #onsci
  4. #Onsci Q2 Hopefully the increasing amount of open access seen in 2011 will continue into 2012, that would be awesome. #scientistwishlist
  5. Oooh! Agree heartily with all who have mention Open Access as a major issue in science (and engagement). #onsci Q2
  6. In my field, I'm hoping 2012 sees the release of some open source ecology projects. #onsci
  7. One open access tool was mentioned ...
  8. #onsci Figshare.com may be a new and interesting way to deal with open access and data sharing. Check here: wellcometrust.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/fig…
  9. @adamgdunn Have been sussing out figshare, intrigues me, but getting supervisors on board difficult #onsci
  10. ... which prompted a general discussion about acceptance of open access within the scientific community and ways that it could gain more acceptance ...
  11. #onsci But how much support is there for open access in the scientific community? I hear it as a buzzword but I don't see it
  12. @Ivalaine exactly. Great for the wider community, although the jargon may not make it that much more accessible #onsci
  13. Open access is a generational thing in science, as more junior scientists take over there will be stronger push. @scienceupulie #onsci
  14. #onsci there is still a lot of snobby opposition to open access
  15. or worries about quality? RT @scienceupulie: #onsci there is still a lot of snobby opposition to open access
  16. prestige etc. RT @scienceupulie: #onsci there is still a lot of snobby opposition to open access
  17. I have open disdain for open access, but I am also using it RT @Ivalaine: @scienceupulie I hear a lot of open disdain for open access #onsci
  18. @scienceupulie Old boys network for paper submission isn't compatible with open access/transparent review #onsci
  19. @DrYobbo #onsci and the network isn't into open collaboration and collective papers
  20. .@andchars @Ivalaine @scienceupulie Pure OpenAccess is fine. The evil hybrid where ppl pay to publish & libraries still pay is evil #OnSci
  21. The issue of 'opposition' to open access and the challenges posed by it continued as part of question 4
  22. Lots on open access. Will collect your thoughts so far, but Q4: how might open access unfold this year? What are the key issues? #onsci

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Heather Bray

Science communicator/researcher in agriculture & food. Love science, passionate about ag. Enjoy making stuff & always learning! Opinions are all my own.

Total views
22

Storify

@Storify