Other

#ACESchat 1: The Value of Editing

The American Copy Editors Society hosted its first Twitter chat from 4-5:15 p.m. EST on Dec. 4. Our topic was Editing’s Value: New Research and How to Convince Your Boss What You Do Matters.

  1. Welcome to #ACESchat. We're revved about our topic, 'The Value of Editing' and our guests @fredvultee, @KUBremner and @andybechtel.
  2. First, we talked about what kinds of errors readers notice most. Chatters paid particular attention to spelling errors and errors of fact.
  3. OK, Q1: What kinds of things do readers notice most if editors aren't around to catch them – spelling, grammar or factual errors? #ACESchat
  4. @null #ACESchat Readers are likeliest to comment about factual errors. Then they'll catch spelling errors, esp. on names or easy words.
  5. Q1: Readers are more likely to jump all over factual errors first; the rest, they let slide. #ACESchat
  6. A1: I think any of them, depending on the audience. Get the stats wrong in a baseball story and expect a ton of feedback. #ACESchat
  7. Q1: I tend to lump spelling/facts as "professionalism" -- they can tell we're inconsistent even if they can't spell "Hillary." #ACESchat
  8. A1: It doesn't matter online. Some troll will notice whatever mistake is there to find. #ACESchat
  9. Agreed. Typos in display type seem worse. RT @robtmanjr: @copyeditors Spelling usually more obvious, especially in headlines. #ACESchat
  10. #ACESchat In reviews of self-published works, you see readers get irked at typos. Spend money on a book, you expect a certain standard.
  11. @Mededitor Exactly. If a writer doesn't care enough to put the best product out there, then why should I hand over money for it? #ACESchat
  12. Q1: I agree. Spelling/grammatical errors jump out the most in headlines & subheads. #ACESchat
  13. Q2: There's a perception editing matters more in print than online. Is this your experience and do you think readers agree? The response by @PerciseProofing hit a chord with most of the chatters.
  14. Q2: Editing ALWAYS matters. Whether it's in print or online, it's your image that's at stake. #ACESchat
  15. Q2. Online editing is as important as print. Either way, people are reading your message and making an assumption about you. #ACESchat
  16. However, many say there seems to be a bigger tolerance for errors online.
  17. A2: I think that perception is there. It shouldn't matter, but the relative permanence of print probably is a factor. #ACESchat
  18. Q2: Tolerance for errors will be predicated on the type of content - Merriam-Webster isn't Buzzfeed, right? #ACESchat
  19. A2: People recognize that the web is full of nonprofessional writers, & online content can be fixed, lowering quality expectations #ACESchat
  20. @copyeditors Neither should matter more than the other, but once it's in print you can't fix it. #ACESchat
  21. Not being a copy editor myself, I'm very self-conscious about my own typos, now that I'm blogging at ACES. #ACESchat
  22. Fred Vultee, an ACES board member and professor at Wayne State University, who is the author of ACES-sponsored research on tolerance for errors online said:
  23. Q2: Online readers value editing -- they expect different things than print readers sometimes but still don't like errors. #aceschat

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Gerri Berendzen

Copy editor at Quincy (Ill.) Herald-Whig. American Copy Editors Society board member. Go Billikens! Mizzou-rah!

Total views
237

Storify

@Storify