- So I'm breaking my "no more UK election tweets" promise to make a few observations about proportional representation (a mild obsession).
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597900308950323200
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:05:16
Vote/seat breakdown if parties had lists in each of the 4 UK nations (England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland). pic.twitter.com/OKb08epRCnhttps://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597901497339236352
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:10:00- And vote/seat totals for the entire country's 650 seats: pic.twitter.com/XXgNkEF6X9
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597902212757499906
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:12:50 - Obvious PR winners would be @UKIP, @TheGreenParty, and @LibDems, losers: @theSNP, and @Conservatives.
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597903085780897792
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:16:18 - .@UKLabour would technically lose seats (232 to 198), but I'd argue they would be in a better position...
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597903795243253761
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:19:07 - 1) They'd go from 100 behind Tories to 40 behind 2) No Tory majority 3) From 1 to 14 seats in Scotland
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597904459440590848
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:21:46
To be clear, Tories would still have won and Cameron would have stayed Prime Minister due to coalition arithmetic: pic.twitter.com/lOPHS9bGxjhttps://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597905450684678144
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:25:42- But I have to imagine LAB would be able to use CON having to rely on UKIP votes against them the same way CON did same to LAB w/r/t SNP.
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597906122733854720
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:28:22 - "Do you really want Nigel Farage to be Deputy Prime Minister?" etc
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597906456118046721
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:29:42 - This is of course an imperfect analysis, because electoral reform would change who people vote for.
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597907527406264320
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:33:57 - From Labour's perspective, none of this changes fact that first priorities have to be making up deficits on economy and leadership.
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597908249241718784
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:36:49 - But embracing PR, in addition to being better for democracy on merits, would be in their self-interest.
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597908597176041472
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:38:12 - In the same way it would significantly benefit @TheDemocrats in the U.S., which I wrote about last fall: http://bit.ly/1K35McI .
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597909066870992896
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:40:04 - By the way, there are parallels between the "boundary changes" the Tories are proposing and GOP gerrymandering: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-19166125 ….
https://twitter.com/DevinMitchell/status/597909989223567360
— Devin Mitchell (@DevinMitchell)Mon, May 11 2015 23:43:44


