@rawfileblog: 20 tweets on debate over Haviv's Lockheed Martin ad
@rawfileblog published a thread on the debate about Ron Haviv's photographs being sold for use in advertisements by Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems. It contains 20 tweets -- well, 19, because I can't find a #17 in their timeline - summarising the unfolding, the questions, and the follow up posts.
(2). Photobloggers - including @brookpete, @LPVMagazine & @DavidC7 - and publics demanded better journalistic approach from @duckrabbitblog.- (5) To force the point Duck Rabbit published some screen shots of Twitter, to emphasize the rippling concern: duckrabbit.info/blog/2012/05/q…
- (6) Uber-blogger, Joerg Colberg, expressed his concern and interest in the matter: jmcolberg.com/weblog/2012/05…
- (7) @RonHaviv published his response on Sunday: ronhaviv.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ron… (On what looks to be a purposefully set up Wordpress blog.)
- (8) @RonHaviv: "I draw a strict line between my photojournalism and commercial campaigns." ronhaviv.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/ron…
- (10) MT @StellaKramer [...] Ron Haviv's images & their use. We have another issue here: how closely do you control your work?
- (11) MT @Michaelfriberg: "Shouldn't somebody in @RonHaviv's position maybe be more vigilant about who his pictures are sold to?"
- (12) .@adamgasson: "Stock photos and weapons don’t kill people. People kill people." dancainey.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/duc…
- (13) RT @RonHaviv Here is my response to the current discussion re: advertising photography and photojournalism wp.me/p2tjZZ-B
- (16) .@BagNewsNotes calls for "negotiated rules of media-military engagement." bagnewsnotes.com/2012/05/war-en…
- (18) Jim Johnson, on Ron Haviv's response: "No responsibility in sight." politicstheoryphotography.blogspot.com/2012/05/antiwa…
- (19) Meanwhile, @MarcoBohr looks at Nachtwey's propagandist photos of Syria's ruling Assad family: visualcultureblog.com/2012/05/the-pe…
