What kind of inequality matters most?

A discussion between Miles Kimball and Daniel Altman about inequality, opportunity, and taxation

  1. Taxing big spenders is better than taxing the rich. Many of the rich got there by doing good. But there is no nobility to big spending.
  2. In theory, yes. To fight inequality, no. (bigthink.com/econ201/taxati…) RT @mileskimball: Taxing big spenders is better than taxing the rich.
  3. .@altmandaniel Taxing big spenders fights inequality in consumption.
  4. But not inequality in access to opportunity, the most important kind. RT @mileskimball Taxing big spenders fights inequality in consumption.
  5. .@altmandaniel I don't see this. Equality of opportunity seems a matter for the spending side of government activities, not the tax side.
  6. @mileskimball In a perfect world, yes. But those measures take generatn to work. By then we'll be back to feudalism. Need fast 2nd best fix.
  7. .@altmandaniel But I don't see how taxing the rich rather than big spenders helps equality of opportunity at all.
  8. .@altmandaniel I think you are pointing to inequality in power, rather than inequality in opportunity.
  9. @mileskimball False distinction. Control of resources and high human capital lead to opportunities (the biggest) as well as power.
  10. .@altmandaniel Conceptually, this is the problem of people buying intangible consumption not subject to a VAT tax with their wealth.
  11. .@altmandaniel But a much bigger type of intangible consumption not subject to tax is choosing fun, low-paying jobs instead of high-paying.
  12. @mileskimball So what do you think is a practical solution that also deals with meritocratic concerns?
  13. .@altmandaniel I just don't see large numbers of the rich beating out the talented in meritocratic contexts.
  14. @mileskimball The problem is that the contexts aren't meritocratic. Running for office, getting into private college, starting a business...
  15. @mileskimball All of these contexts are affected by wealth, and much moreso than they used to be.

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Daniel Altman

Writing @ForeignPolicy @BigThink @SimonSchuster | Teaching @NYUStern | Speaking @APBspeakers | Consulting at http://nyecon.com | Email list via website

Total views
28

Storify

@Storify