Hello iPad user! You should definitelydownload and try our free iPad app!

Published (M)

Ads on council websites

Today, Adrian Short (@adrianshort) started a very interesting debate about the rights and wrongs of council websites selling space to advertisers on their websites. I've probably not got all the important tweets, so if you find any more please tell me.

  1. adrianshort
    @PSFbuzz @davebriggs @MMaryMcKenna Selling crack from the Town Hall foyer would generate supplementary revenue. But a net benefit?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  2. iamadonut
    @carriebish @adrianshort @lesteph @davebriggs Click throughs bad; but placed ads difficult to sell - other than home page/planning.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  3. iamadonut
    @carriebish @adrianshort @lesteph @davebriggs Is there not also an issue about nicking ad revenue from other sectors? as per council mags.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  4. adrianshort
    @carriebish They are two separate issues. 1) Some ads may be inappropriate 2) Ads never produce a net benefit on council sites.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  5. davebriggs
    @carriebish @adrianshort @lesteph yes that's my position. I don't care if councils run ads, but they ought to be careful about them.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  6. carriebish
    @adrianshort @lesteph @davebriggs So the complaint is more what they are/aren't endorsing than ads themselves? 2 separate issues?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  7. curiousc
    @carriebish @lesteph @davebriggs @adrianshort did some digging around - could find nothing systematic or +ve - worth trying socitim?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  8. adrianshort
    @carriebish @lesteph @davebriggs I think you do implicitly endorse anything you put on your site. Would a council run an EDL advert?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  9. carriebish
    @adrianshort @lesteph @davebriggs Agree is crap but doubt users will be confused or think ads are council endorsed. That's a bit patronising
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  10. adrianshort
    @carriebish In a sample of one (me) I'd say that the ads make @MyNottingham look like spivs. YMMV.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  11. davebriggs
    @carriebish well, it's either indifference or loathing isn't it? Not the sort of thing anyone actually likes!
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  12. carriebish
    @lesteph @davebriggs @adrianshort is there any qual/quant evidence of what site users think of the ads?
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  13. davebriggs
    @lesteph and there's a lot of content easily found on the internet that shouldn't appear on a government website!!!
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  14. davebriggs
    @lesteph not against ads, but I think they should be strongly vetted. Lots of people will see that as the council advocating the service.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  15. lesteph
    @davebriggs Not sure what I think about that kinda thing. Aren't they just saving a bit of money? Not as if people won't see that elsewhere.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  16. adrianshort
    @sarahlay @abeeken @pezholio Nottingham has sold out its most vulnerable residents for £15K a year from Google. There's no excuse for it.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  17. adrianshort
    As if Nottingham City Council's site could be any more offensive, they piss away the Google money putting The Sun's news on their home page.
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  18. adrianshort
    My complaint to Nottingham City Council about their exploitative Google adverts: http://bit.ly/kA9WFi #localgovweb /cc @MyNottingham
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments
  19. adrianshort
    @garysims Then the responsible thing to do would be to remove the ads entirely. It's a public service not a business. http://bit.ly/bniGJQ
    0 likes
     · 
    0 comments

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!
Total views
9
  • other
    9