- .@nytkeller: time spent on "your 200 Facebook friends" is at expense of "in person" sociality. Research says otherwise. is.gd/BRZsXF
- Yes. Here's non-paywalled article from @mysocnet bit.ly/kRelbB @nytkeller: @techsoc Um, did you plan on linking to the research?
- .@nytkeller My earlier paper (college age, not national) finds same number of friends b/w users & non-users of FB. bit.ly/lX897d
- .@nytkeller Nationally-representative sample, @barrywellman & Wang: bit.ly/lTOHPV Either no diff or heavy net-users have more friends
- Correction, sorry. RT @mubaraketganen: @mysocnet @nytkeller there was an extra RT at the end of the link, this works bit.ly/acnWcM
- .@nytkeller Jeffrey Boase study from 2006 about email. Email users had more close ties than non-users. bit.ly/acjJYj
- .@nytkeller, latest @pewinternet by @mysocnet bit.ly/jphw7B. Need to look at regressions. No effect of FB or Twitter on network size.
- @techsoc @nytkeller I also have paper under review where I found student time on FB is + related to time spent in co-curricular activities
- OK, folks, over &out, need to finish that revision I mentioned. @nytkeller totally right on about that. Twitter can displace writing time:-)
- Yes, excellent book RT @nancybaym: @nytkeller You could also read my book that summarizes this research, esp chapter 6: bit.ly/mgtH7T
- I feel like I just saw @techsoc pull Marshall McLuhan out from behind a movie poster: t.co/XA1UOIS



