Social media buzz: Keystone pipeline, and teachers with guns
Popular topics in Opinion this week: Our editorial debate on the Keystone pipeline, and a republican senator says no to giving teachers guns.
- Everything I have read about this pipeline says that the transported oil will NOT stay in the U.S. It will cross the U.S. to get to Gulf coast ports to be shipped to other countries. So the pipeline will NOT mean more oil for us and will do NOTHING to reduce gas prices. The oil will not even be refined here since all of our refineries are running at capacity and there are no plans to build more.
- Head-in-the-sand non-scientists using non-scientific arguments without any clue. Thats why they want to call it "Settled Science", because they can't understand, or argue the facts (maybe they have other agendas they don't want to devulge). It is folly to lend any weight to their non- scientific arguments.. Why did they have to stop calling it Global Warming? Because there has been no data to support that argument. They have even abandoned the classic 'cause and effect' argument that generally accompanies scientific theory. WHAT A SHAM!
- I can disagree with many things in this editorial, other than the conclusion. I agree ... build it, now that it has been rerouted. It won't do much, other than supply a few short-term jobs, and a touch more oil. But the irony is that US gas prices are going up now because refineries are cutting back. What will they do with even MORE oil that requires even more processing? Anybody got a solution?
- Had to read the head line 3 times and make sure that it was USA Today giving approval of this pipe line. Totally agree, will place more oil on the market, will give high paying US jobs to build and sustain it and COAL, not oil is the major polluter. The US is a gold mine when it comes to energy, we just need to tap into it.
Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to like or comment.