UChicagoLaw Faculty Discuss Health Care Decision

Live tweets from a discussion on June 28, 2012 about the just-handed-down Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act.

  1. Live tweeting of the @uchicagolaw faculty discussing the #ACA decision will begin in just a few minutes. #UChiLawSCt
  2. Prof Julie Roin has stepped to the podium to start off our discussion! #UChiLawSCt
  3. Prof Geof Stone asks why did Justice Roberts make this decision? #UChiLawSCt
  4. Hutchinson: deft move by Roberts -Congress can't hold a gun to the heads of the states. Most states are going to take the money. #UChiLawSCt
  5. Picker drew a grid to figure out the nine votes on the 7 issues. #UChiLawSCt
  6. "Caveat emptor" says @randypicker, but here's his grid trying to figure out the nine votes on 7 issues from #UChiLawSCt http://pic.twitter.com/IrW0JUpe
  7. Picker: most interesting is the interaction between the commerce and tax powers. #UChiLawSCt
  8. LaCroix: you could come out of all of this and say that this isn't a use of the commerce power. #UChiLawSCt
  9. Huq: If a Romney administration wants to privatize Social Security, that would be off the table. Fennell: Why? #UChiLawSCt
  10. Roin: Agree that it's off the table - it's not a tax. Huq: You could find a way to write it so it's a tax. #UChiLawSCt
  11. Huq: No Jusitce except for Thomas says anything negative about any past commerce clause decision. LaCroix: same true in Lopez. #UChiLawSCt
  12. Fennell: open question of whether if a program is too big, too much, then it's not ok. #UChiLawSCt
  13. LaCroix: This decision brings back into the conversation the idea of coercing the states to take certain action. #UChiLawSCt
  14. McAdams: Does this decision mean that big changes are different than tiny little changes? Is proportionality implicit? #UChiLawSCt
  15. Grid displayed, time to tweet. On the Medicaid issue, how should Congress change programs and still avoid coercion as to states? #UChiLawSCt
  16. Strahilevitz: nice parallel betw parts of the opinion about whether it's a permissible tax & those dealing with state/federal. #UChiLawSCt
  17. Huq: In the state, but not the individual, context the dependency is bilateral. Not just the states that are locked in. #UChiLawSCt
  18. Huq: It's still possible for a state to say we're not going to take Medicaid. #UChiLawSCt
  19. Stahilevitz: How will the administration respond to the Medicaid strike down? #UChiLawSCt
  20. Under existing law, the administration doesn't have to think about much other than think about implementation. #UChiLawSCt
  21. Exchanges are largely going to benefit small group and individual buyers. #UChiLawSCt
  22. Huge amount of tax breaks go to anyone who purchases in the exchange. #UChiLawSCt
  23. Picker: This is about our inability to make choices and need for the government to help us. #UChiLawSCt
  24. Picker: Can the government can pass a law that says "you have to buy lettuce every month and if you don't, pay a tax." #UChiLawSCt
  25. Everyone else: "Yes." Roin: "It's like charity - give to charity or pay higher taxes." #UChiLawSCt

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

UChicago Law School

Life of the mind? We'll show you the life of the mind. Hosted by @aaronrester and @nagorsky.

Total views
624

Storify

@Storify