1. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/
  2. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/
  3. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/
  4. @NateMJensen @dhnexon @tompepinsky @irfan23 ideally papers would matter most but adviser influence hard to see, lots of work
  5. @BrendanNyhan @dhnexon @TomPepinsky @irfan23 My gut says JT over weighted. But I need to think about the other weights.
  6. @dhnexon @NateMJensen @TomPepinsky @irfan23 besides overweighting JT results, my other concern is influence of extraneous non-verbal factors
  7. @BrendanNyhan @natemjensen @tompepinsky @irfan23 actually studying causes of differential scholarly outcomes might be xplsv ;-)
  8. Exactly @BrendanNyhan Especially as faculty use as substit for deeper eval of rsrch/temperament/capab @tompepinsky @natemjensen @irfan23
  9. @NateMJensen @tompepinsky @brendannyhan @irfan23 wld like "second line" ans, espcly to (1) objcts to specific form & (2) negtvs 2 SQ. 2/2
  10. @NateMJensen @tompepinsky @brendannyhan @irfan23 but what piece? These are the standard args. I made stab at preempting them. 1/2
  11. @TomPepinsky @BrendanNyhan @irfan23 @dhnexon Agree. This is why I still can't find a sub for the job talk. Adds important piece to the puzz
  12. @TomPepinsky @natemjensen @irfan23 @dhnexon 1:1s probably best for fit. Problem is job talk salience is so high it can dominate on all dims.
  13. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/
  14. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/
  15. RT @jerometenk: @dhnexon @BrendanNyhan @TomPepinsky @NateMJensen @irfan23 Couldn't stop myself from writing more about job talks. http://scienceofpolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/defending-the-job-talk/

Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to or comment.

Liked!

Tom Pepinsky

assistant prof @Cornell. Politics, finance, methods, Southeast Asia. Academic website at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/tp253

Total views
29

Storify

@Storify