#RISciMedia Debate: Scientists and journalists need different things from science
This Storify collates the online conversations around the debate that occurred at the Royal Institution on Tuesday 13th March. Organised by Alok Jha of the Guardian and chaired by Alice Bell, it covered the most controversial of topics; coverage of science in the media.
- How science is covered in the media has been causing much debate online in recent months. This debate aimed to create a forum for exploring practical suggestions for how to improve the situation. Panelists were Dr Chris Chambers, University of Cardiff, Ananyo Bhattacharya, Chief Online Editor of Nature, Fiona Fox from the Science Media Centre and science blogger, Ed Yong.
- The event started with an introduction by Alice Bell.
- Then, Alok Jha, Guardian journalist and organiser explained the thesis for discussion and introduced the panelists:
- — Lou Woodley (@LouWoodley)Tue, Mar 13 2012 12:07:11
- Getting the night started, Dr Chris Chambers, of the University of Cardiff's School of Psychology, with some interesting facts and three suggestions for scientists
- — Melanie Hall (@MelanieHall)Tue, Mar 13 2012 12:12:43First speaker Chris Chambers: What, if anything, can scientists do to help quality of sci journalism? You might argue not much #riscimedia
- — Laura Wheeler (@laurawheelers)Tue, Mar 13 2012 12:16:23Anticipate the likely angle journalists will take, taking into account current social/ political context! #riscimedia
- — Andy Williams (@llantwit)Tue, Mar 13 2012 12:17:14#riscimedia Chris Chambers says scientists should blog about their work, summarise findings for journos, & demystify scientific process
Did you find this story interesting? Be the first to like or comment.