Here today, gone tomorrow. How today’s retirement choices could affect financial resilience over the long term.

On the 16th of March, ILC-UK launched “Here today, gone tomorrow: How today’s retirement choices could affect financial resilience over the long term?” - new research made possible with the support of Aviva.

  1. Launching two days before the 2015 budget and less than a month before the new pensions freedoms come into effect, we believe this report is timely. While the new freedoms have been a source of much debate and speculation since they were announced in the Budget of 2014, there has been little or no quantitative research into the long-term impact on retirees’ finances.

    This report is the first detailed exploration of what certain choices made today could mean for overall levels of retirement income adequacy over the next 30 years. Using in-depth analysis of the largest representative survey of people over 50 in England (the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing), it quantifies the potential level of consumer harm associated with particular choices and outlines which consumer segments are most at risk of facing income shortfalls if they make certain decisions. It is therefore a must read for industry, regulators, policymakers and consumer bodies.

    This report is the first part of a wider programme of ILC-UK work entitled Sustainable Older Society 2020 (SOS 2020). The SOS 2020 project aims to develop intergenerational solutions to deliver an economically sustainable and long term approach to an ageing society. There are two branches to the project, this one which focuses on finance and another with a focus on health.
  2. The report models the outcomes of four different approaches to using DC pension wealth: 1) annuitising, 2) blowing the pot on big ticket items, 3) putting everything into a savings account and 4) leaving the fund invested. It utilises data from the largest survey of the over 50s in England and applies these approaches to different consumer segments aged 55-74. It finds that:
  3. - Even if all those approaching retirement were to annuitise, over half (1.1 million people) will not be able to secure an adequate income unless they use non-pension assets or receive additional benefits on top of the State Pension.
  4. - But in a scenario where the DC pot is used to buy big ticket items, an additional 350,000 people (1.4 million people in total) will not be able to secure an adequate income in retirement.
  5. - Putting everything in a savings account also risks people running out of money before they die. We project that average replacement rates could fall from 66% when they have some savings left to 49% when they do not. Given that people typically underestimate their life expectancy by upwards of four years, spending savings too early is a real possibility.
  6. - Leaving the fund invested also risks people running out of money before death as well exposing individuals to substantial income volatility. Within a balanced fund of 60% bonds and 40% equities, we estimate that average annual income in retirement could range between £18,000 and £12,000 until the fund runs out.
  7. Not everyone will be equally affected by the choices they make. There are 850,000 individuals who are at high risk of seeing big income shortfalls from making particular decisions. Many of the individuals from this group have low levels of financial capability allied to a high concentration of financial wealth locked up in DC schemes. For this group the report finds:
  8. - Blowing the pot would lead to a substantial fall in average projected replacement rates - from a replacement rate of almost 70% if they annuitise, to less than 40% if they blow the pot.
  9. - Putting everything into a savings account could result in substantial income falls at the end of life – from a replacement rate of over 60% when they have some savings to less than 40% when savings run out.
  10. - Keeping the fund invested could also result in substantial falls in income at the end of life for this group – from a replacement rate of over 70% when they can draw on the fund to less than 40% when the fund runs dry.
  11. The report argues that “such income falls coming at the end of life could have disastrous implications resulting in individuals cutting back on expenditure just at a time when they may need it most – i.e. to maintain basic living standards as well as paying for long-term care”.
Read next page