Twitter Debate of the Week: Immigration

Matt Yglesias' Slate piece on immigration reform helped initiate a debate between @reihan, @m_clem and @charlesjkenny on Wednesday, June 20th, 2012. Our recap below.

  1. Michael Clemen's piece for the Center for Global Development on workers from developing countries taking the jobs of Americans (Feb. 28, 2012):
  2. @reihan @mattyglesias 1. Tail of global Gini is <$/day --matters more 2. National Gini not determined by migration <<1% pop/yr.
  3. Explanation of the GINI Project: 
  4. @mattyglesias Big developments since then. The visa exists and is now being used. And good for this country, for the reasons you give.
  5. @reihan @charlesjkenny Typically, if they do not immigrate, they are much poorer and their children much less skilled.
  6. @charlesjkenny Less-skilled workers in US have seen their labor market position deteriorate. Migrants subjectively experience place premium
  7. @charlesjkenny but they instantly join ranks of the poorest in the new country. Their children, in turn, face a serious skill deficit
  8. @reihan migrants *objectively* experience place premium. Impact on low skilled US workers approx zero --see businessweek.com/magazine/how-t…
  9. @charlesjkenny relative to the children of native-born parents, and this gap tends to persist. While I'm sympathetic to notion that
  10. @charlesjkenny global Gini is more morally significant, I don't think you're giving due regard to dynamics within affluent societies.
  11. @reihan @charlesjkenny Deterioration of low-skill position has led to huge decrease in fraction who are low-skill (dropout rates way down)
  12. @m_clem @charlesjkenny My sense is that Michael is not a national egalitarian but rather a global prioritarian. That's commendable.
  13. @reihan (Now Googling 'prioritarianism'... I always learn from you!)
  14. Prioritarianism: is a view within ethics and political philosophy that holds that the goodness of an outcome is a function of overall well-being across all individuals with extra weight given to worse-off individuals. (For more information on prioritarianism, see Nils Holtug article for UPenn Law Journal below)
  15. @m_clem But national egalitarians are more likely to shape domestic social policy. I fully endorse introducing a humanitarian component
  16. @m_clem @charlesjkenny to migration policy, e.g., prioritizing less-skilled migrants from highly indebted poor countries over less-skilled
  17. "If we’re going to accept a large but finite number of less-skilled immigrants, it seems far more coherent to select them on humanitarian grounds, e.g., from highly-indebted poor countries with poor growth prospects, rather than on grounds of geographical proximity." - Reihan Salam, "Bryan Caplan on Immigration," Jan. 27, 2012

Did you find this story interesting? or comment as 1 already did!

Liked!

Hamilton Place

A Washington, D.C. consultancy, offering strategic communications and public policy advisory services. Curated by @noahchestnut @ashleyycsmith & @Russell_Grote

Total views
55

Storify

@Storify